Siqi Li

Background: Federated learning (FL) holds promise for safeguarding data privacy in healthcare collaborations. While the term “FL” was originally coined by the engineering community, the statistical field has also developed privacy-preserving algorithms, though these are less recognized. Our goal was to bridge this gap with the first comprehensive comparison of FL frameworks from both domains. Methods: We assessed seven FL frameworks, encompassing both engineering-based and statistical FL algorithms, and compared them against local and centralized modeling of logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso). Our evaluation utilized both simulated data and real-world emergency department data, focusing on comparing both estimated model coefficients and the performance of model predictions. Results: The findings reveal that statistical FL algorithms produce much less biased estimates of model coefficients. Conversely, engineering-based methods can yield models with slightly better prediction performance, occasionally outperforming both centralized and statistical FL models. Conclusion: This study underscores the relative strengths and weaknesses of both types of methods, providing recommendations for their selection based on distinct study characteristics. Furthermore, we emphasize the critical need to raise awareness of and integrate these methods into future applications of FL within the healthcare domain.

Objective We propose FedScore, a privacy-preserving federated learning framework for scoring system generation across multiple sites to facilitate cross-institutional collaborations. Materials and methods The FedScore framework includes five modules: federated variable ranking, federated variable transformation, federated score derivation, federated model selection and federated model evaluation. To illustrate usage and assess FedScore’s performance, we built a hypothetical global scoring system for mortality prediction within 30 days after a visit to an emergency department using 10 simulated sites divided from a tertiary hospital in Singapore. We employed a pre-existing score generator to construct 10 local scoring systems independently at each site and we also developed a scoring system using centralized data for comparison. Results We compared the acquired FedScore model’s performance with that of other scoring models using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The FedScore model achieved an average area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.763 across all sites, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.020. We also calculated the average AUC values and SDs for each local model, and the FedScore model showed promising accuracy and stability with a high average AUC value which was closest to the one of the pooled model and SD which was lower than that of most local models. Conclusion This study demonstrates that FedScore is a privacy-preserving scoring system generator with potentially good generalizability.

Federated learning (FL) has gained popularity in clinical research in recent years to facilitate privacy-preserving collaboration. Structured data, one of the most prevalent forms of clinical data, has experienced significant growth in volume concurrently, notably with the widespread adoption of electronic health records in clinical practice. This review examines FL applications on structured medical data, identifies contemporary limitations, and discusses potential innovations.We searched 5 databases, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL, to identify articles that applied FL to structured medical data and reported results following the PRISMA guidelines. Each selected publication was evaluated from 3 primary perspectives, including data quality, modeling strategies, and FL frameworks.Out of the 1193 papers screened, 34 met the inclusion criteria, with each article consisting of one or more studies that used FL to handle structured clinical/medical data. Of these, 24 utilized data acquired from electronic health records, with clinical predictions and association studies being the most common clinical research tasks that FL was applied to. Only one article exclusively explored the vertical FL setting, while the remaining 33 explored the horizontal FL setting, with only 14 discussing comparisons between single-site (local) and FL (global) analysis.The existing FL applications on structured medical data lack sufficient evaluations of clinically meaningful benefits, particularly when compared to single-site analyses. Therefore, it is crucial for future FL applications to prioritize clinical motivations and develop designs and methodologies that can effectively support and aid clinical practice and research.